
I had an interesting experience this week that really brought home how important it is to have a strong personal editor-writer rapport.
Along with working to build my own client list, I’ve been applying to positions to do some proofreading/copyediting for external companies. I see it as a great way to bring in a steady income while also developing the skills I want to put back into my own business.
This particular job would have been great. Working from home, choice of projects, ability to choose my own hours… but no client interaction. Everything would come from the company-as-mediator.
This sort of raised some questions for me, but I figured I would apply for it anyway as it couldn’t hurt to see what the process was like.
Part of the application was a series of mock assignments based on the various types of projects that would be coming in. Technical papers, English assignments, blog posts, etc.
But as I started it, I realized how much of a double-edged sword having the company-as-mediator would wind up being.
Now, to be fair, I come at projects very much with a creative-editor/writer mindset, where keeping the voice and authenticity of the piece clear is just as crucial as ensuring it’s typographically/grammatically clean. This company, I suspect, is looking for more of a technical editor. Someone who just dives in and makes changes at will.
But as I was working through these assignments, there were moment where I was left with questions. The meaning of the sentence wasn’t entirely clear. Was there more to the point they were trying to make? A sentence that started, but never really ended, arguments that never seemed to reach their point.
I suppose the point of the test was to prove that I could edit these sentences in a way that made them sound complete, however possible. But that would just be rewriting someone else’s work, which, I guess, just isn’t in me to do. I want to be able to foster relationships with my clients, just as I foster relationships with my editors. I want to be able to leave comments in track changes requesting/suggesting clarifications, just as I love when my editors do this for me. It allows the weaknesses to be caught without losing the authenticity of the piece.
It takes a great deal of trust to send someone your work. Ego is involved, money is involved, and your faith in the final product before it goes out into the world. More than anything else, you want to make sure that you’re working with someone who cares about your WIP as much as you do, who wants to make sure that the best version of it goes out into the world.
To date, I’ve been incredibly lucky in the editors I’ve worked with. They had turned the pages of my WIP black and blue, but I have walked away with the absolutely confidence my book was stronger for it.
If I can be that and offer that for someone else, then that just makes every comma question worthwhile.
What do you look for in an editor?
I look for an editor not afraid to tell me like it is. Also, a sense of humor is paramount. I, personally, don’t want sugar-coating. If my misuse of commas is making my editor twitch uncontrollably, I don’t want them to suggest a solution. Hit me over the head. Sometimes that’s the only way I learn.
It’s good that you know that about yourself! I would hate that. I don’t want sugar-coating, but I don’t want the hammer, either. Explanation, suggestion, and question. That is my ideal trifecta. I’m not afraid of doing the work to fix it, but don’t want to be made to feel like I suck at what I do in the process